Not a mob, but a pressure group has emerged: Shafiqul Alam

Amid ongoing national debate over the role of the media in the post-regime transition, Chief Adviser’s Press Secretary Shafiqul Alam has described the emergence of critical voices within the press as a "pressure group," not a "mob," signaling a shift in the narrative surrounding media accountability and political influence.

Speaking at a seminar titled "Freedom of the Media: Analysis of the Protection of Journalists and Legal Framework", organised by the Center for Governance Studies (CGS) at the CIRDAP Auditorium on Thursday (June 26), Alam argued that the newly vocal media cohort is comprised of those who felt victimised during the previous government's tenure.

"This is not a mob — this is a pressure group," said Alam. "It has been formed as a response to the failures and injustices in journalism over the past 15 and a half years. Those who were denied basic civil liberties during the Awami League regime are now voicing their grievances through this group."

Alam pointed to a critical moment last year to contextualise current developments. "On July 28, 2024, top journalists went to Sheikh Hasina and demanded strict action. That political moment laid the groundwork for today's pressure groups," he said.

The comments sparked pointed questions during the seminar, particularly from Md. Muktadir Rashid, the Bangladesh correspondent for The Irrabati. "Is it the official stance of the new administration to redefine a mob as a pressure group?" he asked.

Shafiqul Alam clarified, "This is not a government position. I am speaking from my own observation. Those affected by previous media conduct are now asserting their presence."

When pressed further about the basis of his assertion — whether it was based on research or personal sentiment — Alam declined to elaborate. "I'm sorry. I will not say anything more about this," he responded.

The seminar, which featured 16 speakers including legal expert Dr. Asif Nazrul, focused on the dual challenges of press freedom and media accountability in a rapidly evolving political landscape.

Alam acknowledged the complex situation facing journalism in Bangladesh, stating, "There is less media freedom here than in developed countries. But alongside the demand for freedom, we must also protect individuals harmed by misinformation."

He also voiced concern about the rise of unverified and misleading content on YouTube and social media platforms, warning of the growing threat of "false journalism." "Incidents of personal defamation are increasing. Yet every time a complaint is raised, it is portrayed as government pressure. This perception must be addressed," he said.

Alam concluded by calling for a comprehensive Journalist Protection Ordinance — not only to safeguard journalists, but also to hold them accountable for misinformation and slander. "We need both protection for genuine journalism and a mechanism to combat its abuse," he said.